Final Life is Strange Battered into two radically different branches: in one Max saves a close girlfriend Chloe, but sacrifices Arkady Bay’s hometown, and in the other – sacrifices Chloe and saves Arkady Bay. Studio Dontnod So far, it does not apply to which ending is canonical, but the secrets may have been revealed by the authors of the official comic book.
Publisher Titan Comics going to publish a four -party history Life is Strange: Dust. This was publicly announced back in April, but the details of the plot were not revealed. But now the synopsis surfaced on the page Life is Strange: Dust In the Amazon store.
As the description says, the comic tells the story of Max and Chloe after the events of one of the ends of the game. Judging by the wording, behind the canon in Dust take the branch where Chloe remained alive, and Arkady Bay is destroyed. However, they say, the comic will pass on you, regardless of which ending you personally prefer you.
Does this mean that Dontnod will also consider Chloe alive in Life is Strange 2? In fact, not really. Firstly, the comic book, although official, it may well take it into an alternative temporary line-in the end, the original game was entirely built on a trip between different versions of one universe. Secondly, Dontnod mentioned that Life is Strange 2 will focus on other characters – perhaps only memories will remain in the sequel from Max and Chloe.
What Life is Strange 2 It is precisely in production, we learned in May 2017.
On May 3, 2018, the Vampyr composer tells how the cello is able to convey a variety of feelings of the protagonist
May 3, 2018 The Savior of Human Life becomes a monster in the new gameplay trailer Vampyr
Life is Strange
Life is Strange 2
The best comments
Yes, nonsense d: We specifically at the end we revolve and save a bunch of acquaintances and strangers while we are going through the city, Chloe says that her life is not worth the whole city. And after that choose it. Yes, Max should end the guilt with him because of the guilt, after that
If for the next https://jokerbetcasino.co.uk/withdrawal/ part they choose which of the two endings is canonical, then I would prefer this particular where Chloe remains alive.
Last of US, Joel puts the device for the future of mankind and takes Ellie with him to satisfy his petty desire to have a “daughter” again – “Oh God, 10 out of 10, a masterpiece of all time. "
Life is Strange, Max, based on his own petty desires, sacrifices one mild town – “to sacrifice an entire city for the sake of one person – this is stupid."
This of course does not apply specifically to you, because I do not know your attitude to Last of US and its ending, but I am sure that there are those who believe that way. In the end, many consider TLOU a masterpiece of all time.
What? What kind of gag? You yourself invented it yourself? This was not said about it anywhere. The rewinding of time does not affect Max’s consciousness, returning back in time, she does not forget anything. On this principle, most riddles are built in lis. Why did this suddenly have changed?
I don’t know, for me the true ending is the one in which Max sacrificed chloa to save the city. Even the plot itself pushes us to such a thought that it is not sad.
We definitely read the comic book.
As for the canonical endings, then due to the lack of an official position (so far), I prefer to think that the canonicality of a particular ending each player determines for himself. For example, I like the ending with the victim of Chloe, and for what reasons:
1. Rationality. To sacrifice one life in order to save hundreds of others the most reasonable option, in my opinion. Nevertheless, the world does not rotate around one Chloe, there are many other people in it, each with their own lives, which also have the right to exist. In addition, such an ending characterizes Chloe as a real hero who was consciously ready to make such a victim. Maxin, on the other hand, characterizes as a rather strong personality capable of pushing personal feelings and emotions into the background, and accept a reasonable choice.
2. Drama. The greatest drama, it seems to me, is in the death of one of the main characters, who accompanied you the whole game that you learned well, to which you are used to and, perhaps, even fell in love with. The death of the whole town is no less dramatic, but with it all the same, such a strong personal connection is created as with the character (at least with me).
Yes, to young maximalists, it is unknown that there is more a reverse hint through the game – “Do not go, moron, it will devour you”
In the alternative branch of time where chlohi disabled cataclysms still occur (death of birds and whales, notes in the newspaper) despite the fact that Max did not save Chloe in the toilet. Her visions of the approach of the storm on the city are also hinting, Max is not a prophet, so these conducts can only be the result of its movement in parallel realities (her or Max from alternative reality) is quite difficult to explain, but I think you are catching. Care, there is still a lot of hints of this, I just don’t remember, I played for a long time.
not related things at all, when the Glavgada cuts Chloe in a landfill, for some reason the hurricane does not go anywhere
And I did not have the third ending option, in the style of the director of the effect of the butterfly. So that Max returning to the toilet saved her friend herself, having substantiated under the bullets. And everyone in general has life, when no one goes into them with their abilities.
Although this is a game convention, it is a very stupid solution from the “Universe” to create a hurricane and miss them. And if I remember correctly the Universe, I rather did not like the fact that Max used abilities, and as a result saved Chloe, and not vice versa
How to sacrifice the city for me for the sake of an extremely close person whom Max saved so many times (including having chosen Chloe and her father between the life of the life). Even taking into account the fact that we have a city filled with your acquaintances and friends. Everything is simple: in the choice between the best friend of all life and a common acquaintance, the hero will most likely choose the first, even if there are a little more than a hundred such acquaintances ..
She was shot in the toilet, she shot himself, she was shot down by the train, she was shot again at a landfill. Even in alternative reality, she lives at the expense of expensive devices, and the only dream is to die. The Universe wants Chloe to be dead, any actions end up in one way or another by its death. But Max appears, which does not allow the universe to commit an integrated universe, which the latter is not particularly happy. And, as a result, it all ends with the creation of a huge hurricane, which should cut out Chloe, even if you have to with the whole city. That is, the very existence of Chloe as a person leads the universe from balance. Therefore, when the city is destroyed, Maxin will be obliged to save Chloe in the future in the future.
Absolutely incorrect comparison. Yes, in TLOU, Joel’s actions call into question the existence of the whole planet and I, as a rational person, were against such an ending. BUT! In TLOU, Joel saves the child, who was with him throughout the game, helped him and supported him in everything, the child who replaced him with the deceased daughter. Joel’s attachment to Eli is his father’s attachment to his daughter. And he sacrifices all the people on Earth (by the way, whether he sacrifices a big question, since no one gave guarantees of the appearance of the vaccine), but sacrifices the sake of his own and dear person, the relationship with which the affection for which he developed throughout the game.
And what about lis? We must sacrifice a girlfriend that we have once abandoned and did not write letters, who in itself is an extremely selfish person and that manipulator (which is said in direct text in the last episode through drug trips Max). And with all this, we must sacrifice not some abstract Arkady-bee with abstract blanks, but with a very specific city where we grew up, with a very specific college, where we studied and quite specific people: the mother of Chloe, who was almost like a native, the wise chlorine, whose personality has undergone transformation to the end of the game and he ceased to seem to seem to seem to seem. A boy who is smelling of Max, and still good half a hundred characters.
I will summarize and repeat once again: the works are fundamentally different, the presentation of the heroes is fundamentally different, the choice in this connection is also fundamentally different, despite the apparent similarity.
Did not play flip.Because I do not get on any side. But I believe that the point here is how these same relations are shown.
I admit that people are ready to sacrifice hundreds of strangers, for the sake of one acquaintance. Because a person by nature is an egoist. But in the fox … let’s say, I haven’t found the reasons for being an egoist. And for me – this is the main problem of the ends of the fox.
Yes, the final elections of the tials are much more complicated.(we are talking about the walking grandfather)
The most idiotic ending and canon. They just made her for the uniform. Max and Chloe dumped from the destroyed city to the sunset, without even taking care of finding out what to help with friends, help survivors. In general, an ill -conceived ending.
